{"id":6,"date":"2019-11-06T08:10:12","date_gmt":"2019-11-06T08:10:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.amexpas.net\/articulos\/?p=6"},"modified":"2019-11-09T20:18:50","modified_gmt":"2019-11-09T20:18:50","slug":"stop-scapegoating-gifted-students-for-inequality","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.amexpas.net\/articulos\/stop-scapegoating-gifted-students-for-inequality\/","title":{"rendered":"Stop Scapegoating Gifted Students for Inequality"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The faulty logic behind intensifying attacks on gifted education<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>When I began teaching children with cognitive difficulties more than \n40 years ago, it seemed that everyone I met had something positive to \nsay about me or my job selection: \u00abYou must have infinite patience.\u00bb \u00abWe\n need more teachers willing to work with students who learn \ndifferently.\u00bb \u00abI could never do such a demanding job.\u00bb<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Several years later, after having worked with a 5th grader who had \nboth learning challenges and an incredibly sharp intellect, I changed my\n career focus to the other end of the special education continuum: I \nbecame a teacher of gifted children. Never before had I worked with such\n a complex child\u2014one who both excelled academically while simultaneously\n facing definite learning and behavioral issues. I figured if one child \nlike this existed, others did, too. I wanted to help these types of \nkids. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I thought that my work with gifted kids would be considered as  valuable as my work with children with cognitive difficulties. However,  that&#8217;s when the laudatory comments stopped and vocal criticisms took the  place of the close-to-sainthood comments I had received earlier in my  career: \u00abWe should spend our scarce education dollars on kids who <em>really<\/em>  need it, not gifted kids.\u00bb \u00abGifted kids don&#8217;t need you half as much as  those who struggle to learn.\u00bb \u00abWhy are you teaching kids who already  have it made in school?\u00bb <\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\"><p>\u00abToday&#8217;s gifted children and their special education programs are blamed for many of society\u2019s ills.\u00bb  <\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>It all seemed so odd to me, as common sense would dictate that\n whichever extreme of the intellectual bell curve children fell on, they\n would have unique learning needs not experienced by so-called \u00abaverage \nstudents.\u00bb<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Of course, I experienced this logical schism more than four decades \nago, so things would certainly be different today, in 2019. And they \nare. The schism is worse. Today&#8217;s gifted children and their special \neducation programs are blamed for many of society&#8217;s ills\u2014educational \ninequality, racial and economic divisions, and the promotion of elitism \namong the parents whose children have been identified as gifted. I&#8217;m not\n exactly sure why this schism has gotten bigger instead of smaller, but \nit might have something to do with our collective American discomfort in\n labeling some kids more intellectually capable than others. And, as a \nresult, gifted kids have become the educational scapegoats for \ndetractors seeking to blame them for simply being themselves.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The most recent salvo into this educational firestorm is the \nrecommendation of the New York City School Diversity Advisory Group, a \ncommission appointed by Mayor Bill DeBlasio, to <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.wixstatic.com\/ugd\/1c478c_f14e1d13df45444c883bbf6590129bd7.pdf\">eliminate most gifted programs<\/a>\n in the city and blend the most intellectually capable children into \ngeneral education classes where the 1st, 4th, or 10th grade teachers \nwill (in theory) be able to meet gifted students&#8217; advanced academic \nneeds. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Proponents of this plan consider the high percentage of White and \nAsian children in the New York City gifted programs and schools to be de\n facto evidence of the above-mentioned -isms: racism, classism, and \nelitism. But, instead of seeing the racial and economic imbalance in \ngifted programs as a cry to expand methods of identifying giftedness in \npopulations of children who are underserved by them, the solution is to \ntoss out what works for <em>some<\/em> children because it doesn&#8217;t work for <em>all<\/em> children. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Eliminating gifted programs, in the New York City schools or anywhere\n else, would be a capitulation to simplistic thinking that denies a \nblatant reality: that gifted children, like any other children with \natypical leaning needs, <em>require<\/em> an education that embraces their needs, not ignores them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Using this same faulty logic, I have to wonder if the New York City \nschools should consider eliminating classes and programs for those with \ndevelopmental delays, as children of color and students from poverty are\n generally overrepresented in such options. How about varsity basketball\n teams, as they tend to be underrepresented by short people and those \nwho can&#8217;t run fast? Or theatre and music programs where auditions are \nrequired, as these auditions tend to eliminate those who can&#8217;t memorize a\n script or sing like a songbird?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>More Opinion<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/EdweekOpinion\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.edweek.org\/media\/2019\/08\/21\/xtwitter_opinion-conversation_promo_280x130.jpg.pagespeed.ic.lSTZyY2pdE.jpg\" alt=\"\"\/><\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/EdweekOpinion\">Follow Opinion here.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>My hunch is that lawsuits would surely follow attempts to \neliminate programs for children with learning challenges. And, woe to \nthe public school that promotes an \u00abeveryone can be on the varsity team\u00bb\n approach to athletics, as game attendance would surely drop without \nsome baseline standard of performance as a prerequisite for becoming a \npoint guard. When common-sense standards are set to match the \nexpectations of performance in either academic or extracurricular \nendeavors, we are not practicing discrimination. Instead, we are \nrecognizing that different kids have different levels of gifts and \ntalents, plain and simple.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I have taught and counseled thousands of gifted children and teens. \nEach of these kids had a parent or other caregiver who wanted nothing \nmore than what every other parent or caregiver wants for their own \nchildren: the chance to shine in their own light and to have their \nintellectual and other learning needs appreciated, respected, and \naddressed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Gifted children have always been in our schools\u2014and they always shall\n be. Denying them educational equity while offering it to every other \nchild with a learning difference is the ultimate example of misplaced \nbias. By seeking to eliminate gifted programs entirely, New York City \nschools and any other jurisdiction inclined to follow their lead would \nbe well-advised to consider that the true meaning of equity is rooted in\n fairness and justice. Applying this understanding of equity universally\n in schools, not by whim, serves all of our students well, including \nthose who are gifted.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<div class=\"mh-excerpt\"><p>The faulty logic behind intensifying attacks on gifted education When I began teaching children with cognitive difficulties more than 40 years ago, it seemed that <a class=\"mh-excerpt-more\" href=\"https:\/\/www.amexpas.net\/articulos\/stop-scapegoating-gifted-students-for-inequality\/\" title=\"Stop Scapegoating Gifted Students for Inequality\">[&#8230;]<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":7,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ingles_articles"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.amexpas.net\/articulos\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.amexpas.net\/articulos\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.amexpas.net\/articulos\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.amexpas.net\/articulos\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.amexpas.net\/articulos\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.amexpas.net\/articulos\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8,"href":"https:\/\/www.amexpas.net\/articulos\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6\/revisions\/8"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.amexpas.net\/articulos\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.amexpas.net\/articulos\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.amexpas.net\/articulos\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.amexpas.net\/articulos\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}